Polls are always accurate. President Dewey was a case in point. [img]wink.gif[/img]
Printable View
Polls are always accurate. President Dewey was a case in point. [img]wink.gif[/img]
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Maybe because the Bush signs are stolen faster than you can replace them. [img]tongue.gif[/img] </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I dunno. I lost my Kerry sign. Poof! Gone.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">A Kerry campaign worker probably saw it and was embarassed to see it in a yard like yours and took it back.Quote:
Originally posted by reason:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Oldie Blonde Kenobi:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">For example, my street has maybe 60 homes, at least 15 of them have Kerry signs. No Bush signs. I don't think a poll is going to accurately pick up the extreme "lumpiness" of the voting blocks that are hellbent on making their candidate win.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Maybe because the Bush signs are stolen faster than you can replace them. [img]tongue.gif[/img] </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I dunno. I lost my Kerry sign. Poof! Gone.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">A Kerry campaign worker probably saw it and was embarassed to see it in a yard like yours and took it back.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">That sounds like something a gay person would say.Quote:
Originally posted by G L:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by reason:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Oldie Blonde Kenobi:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">For example, my street has maybe 60 homes, at least 15 of them have Kerry signs. No Bush signs. I don't think a poll is going to accurately pick up the extreme "lumpiness" of the voting blocks that are hellbent on making their candidate win.
Actually, I see
http://www.electoral-vote.com/
Kerry 271
Bush 247
Still bad news. [img]graemlins/cry_smile.gif[/img]
Today's tally - THEY'RE TIED!
I just checked and found
Bush 271
Kerry 257
However the link that Reason provided shows
Kerry 290
Bush 231
Looks like another wild election... [img]graemlins/party.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/martini.gif[/img]
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I did a quick check of battleground states in both links, at it appears that Lake's link is more up to date.Quote:
Originally posted by LanDroid:
I just checked and found
Bush 271
Kerry 257
However the link that Reason provided shows
Kerry 290
Bush 231
Looks like another wild election... [img]graemlins/party.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/martini.gif[/img]
Here's another one from the NY Times. I suspect this one is more accurate because it recognizes more states are up for grabs.
Kerry 225
Bush 213
Open 100
NYT Electoral Calculator
This morning's numbers:
Electoral Vote Predictor 2004:
Kerry 257 Bush 271
The constant changes in this poll begs the question -- Anyone here EVER been polled?
Yes, I think my wife and I were called on separate occasions during the 2000 election. Heh, prolly 'splains the spike in support for Mick Jaggar. [img]graemlins/wonder.gif[/img]
<font color="#000002" size="1">[ October 23, 2004 10:39 AM: Message edited by: LanDroid ]</font>